Were one to believe
Kevin Levin, the observations and opinions of those from "the outside" of the education establishment - a.k.a., "Big Education" - are "worthless" when it comes to criticizing and critiquing the various shortcomings of America's highly politicized, and increasingly indoctrinating, educational system. That's an interesting perspective. I find that opinion particularly arresting since I am a father of 6, grandparent of 13 (soon to be 14, Lord willin'), and a taxpayer. Though I've never worked as a
paid educator, I did homeschool 4 of my 6 children, do some private tutoring, coach youth basketball, teach Sunday school, and lead a 4H youth group. So, in a very legitimate sense, I
am an "educator." I'm just a volunteer though, I don't get paid for my services. Does that make my contributions, opinions, and observations about education "worthless"? I don't think so. Most parents involved in their community could make the same legitimate claim. So, are parents, grandparents, and taxpayers really "outsiders" when it comes to public (or even private) education? Again, I don't think so. Let's not forget what
should be obvious: were it not for parents, schools would be empty and teachers would be unemployed. Parents produce the raw material, so to speak, for what should be the ultimate product: responsible citizens who are productive members of a free society.
Moreover, were it not for taxpayers (and parents), there would be no funds to build schools and pay teachers. Shouldn't the observations and opinions of those who finance the operations of schools and who send their children to those same schools be valued? I would think so. In the real world, most organizations look upon the views of those whom they ostensibly serve, and who finance their very existance, as very important and worth considering. They take seriously criticisms and critique - as well they should. The concerns of those being served drive the product and services offered - as well they should. Is that not the case in education? Apparently not.
Take the example of the post and the event that led to Levin's comment. Fellow history blogger (and public school teacher), Chris Wehner,
posted links and comments about an event to which he received an invitation. According to Chris, his invitation to attend
this event came as the result of his being an educator. Chris declined the invite, even though it looks to be quite . . . uh, shall we say . . .
interesting? Though Chris declined, would it be safe to assume there are teachers/educators that will attend? I believe that is a reasonable assumption, since they obviously made an apparent, concerted effort to invite many teachers from across the nation and since one of their program tracks includes "Education Organizing, Popular Education."
Would you be concerned if your children's teachers were attending an event that promotes socialism, radical environmentalism, hyper-radical leftist, anti-American, and anti-free market views and philosophies? I think it is safe to assume that the VAST majority of Americans would say yes; regardless of their politics, location, or socioeconomic background.
Think I'm "over-generalizing" or just providing "anecdotal evidence?" Judge for yourself.
First, go to
Chris's post and read his examples. Second, go to the
event site for yourself and simply browse through the site. Let their own stated goals, programs, and philosophies speak for themselves.
And just to be sure you don't miss this, in exploring the USSF site and event (an event that another blogger described as a “wonderful opportunity”), I came across the “Leftist Lounge” which is affiliated with the USSF and links direct from their main page (Under “fundraising” and “be a sponsor”). Below is a link promoting “artwork” in the “Leftist Lounge” featuring, for example, Marxist & murderer, Che Guevera and a poster with “Free Palestine” on it (I guess Helen Thomas would like that one). Other radical revolutionaries are featured as well, some holding weapons, including Leila Khaled who was into such peaceful “social justice” movements as hijacking airplanes. Another poster features “Commandante Ramona” holding a weapon. One poster features wording which says, “if I become hungry, the usurper’s flesh will be my food.” How wholesome. I thought these folks were all about “non-violence.” Yeah, I want folks attending that event to teach our children. Good Lord. Chilling and disturbing indeed.
Another poster featured in the "Leftist Lounge" at the USSF site has the following wording on it:
America is F****** evil
Israel is F****** evil
Right Wing Evangelical Christians are F****** evil
Christopher Columbus is F****** evil
The Founding Fathers were F****** evil
That's just a sampling. Would anyone like to defend that? You can go to the link above and see it for yourself. No, there's no anti-American, leftist radicalism going on here. These are, of course, just the worthless observations and anecdotal examples from a father, grandfather, and educator who some would label an "outsider." Move along, nothing to see here. Sorry, but this "outsider" does not see this event as a "wonderful opportunity" for anyone, especially educators.
And just how much "anecdotal evidence" does one have to examine before one is convinced of a fact? Below is another anecdotal example about the "social justice movement" and promoting it to Junior High and High School students. By the way, what's the largest labor union in the United States?
The National Education Association.
As you will notice, the woman speaking here was, at the time, the Secretary Treasurer of the AFL-CIO. I think most readers are familiar with that union. But what many reading this post may not know is that the NEA has
pledged to "work with" the AFL-CIO.
“NEA shares these values and recognizes the tremendous impact these values will have on our country and our future. That’s why NEA is committed to working collaboratively on quality public education, health care and other critical issues that affect working families. We look forward to working with the AFL-CIO and its leadership team.”
So, let's recap. We have what is, by all appearances, a hyper-radical leftist movement in the United States known as "social justice". We have a high ranking official with the AFL-CIO stating publicly that they intend to promote this movement in our schools. And then we have the Nation's largest union, which just happens to be made up of teachers, pledging to work "collaboratively" with the AFL-CIO on "quality public education."
But not to worry, there is no real evidence this is occurring in our schools. None. There is no agenda. It's all imaginary. This is all just anecdotal evidence from a bunch of crazy, right-wing conspiracy nuts paranoid about nothing. Uh-huh. Call me crazy.